Loan Rate | Loan Demand | Savings Rate | Savings Supply |
---|---|---|---|
6% | $12,100,000 | 2 | $ 4,700,000% |
7% | 10,000,000 | 3 | 5,420,000 |
8% | 8,070,000 | 4 | 8,630,000 |
9% | 6,030,000 | 5 | 9,830,000 |
10% | 4,420,000 | 6 | 11,800,000 |
Loan Rate | Loan Demand | Savings Rate | Savings Supply | New Loans |
---|---|---|---|---|
6% | $12.1 M | 2% | $ 4.7 M | $ 4.7 M |
7% | 10 | 3% | 5.42 | 5.42 |
8% | 8.07 | 4% | 8.63 | 8.07 |
9% | 6.03 | 5% | 9.83 | 6.03 |
10% | 4.42 | 6% | 11.8 | 4.42 |
Loan Rate | Loan Demand | Savings Rate | Savings Supply | New Loans | Processing Expenses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6% | $12.1 M | 2% | $ 4.7 M | $ 4.7 M | $70,500 |
7% | 10 | 3% | 5.42 | 5.42 | 81,300 |
8% | 8.07 | 4% | 8.63 | 8.07 | 121,050 |
9% | 6.03 | 5% | 9.83 | 6.03 | 90,450 |
10% | 4.42 | 6% | 11.8 | 4.42 | 66,300 |
Loan Rate | Loan Demand | Savings Rate | Savings Supply | New Loans | Processing Expenses | Default Exp |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6% | $12.1 M | 2% | $ 4.7 M | $ 4.7 M | $70,500 | $47,000 |
7% | 10 | 3% | 5.42 | 5.42 | 81,300 | 54,200 |
8% | 8.07 | 4% | 8.63 | 8.07 | 121,050 | 80,700 |
9% | 6.03 | 5% | 9.83 | 6.03 | 90,450 | 60,300 |
10% | 4.42 | 6% | 11.8 | 4.42 | 66,300 | 44,200 |
Loan Rate | Loan Demand | Savings Rate | Savings Supply | New Loans | Processing Expenses | Default Exp | Overhead Expenses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6% | $12.1 M | 2% | $ 4.7 M | $ 4.7 M | $70,500 | $47,000 | $30,000 |
7% | 10 | 3% | 5.42 | 5.42 | 81,300 | 54,200 | 30,000 |
8% | 8.07 | 4% | 8.63 | 8.07 | 121,050 | 80,700 | 30,000 |
9% | 6.03 | 5% | 9.83 | 6.03 | 90,450 | 60,300 | 30,000 |
10% | 4.42 | 6% | 11.8 | 4.42 | 66,300 | 44,200 | 30,000 |
Interest income | $8,070,000 × 8%= | $645,600 |
Interest expense | $8,070,000 × 4%= | 322,800 |
Net interest income | $322,800 | |
Fixed overhead | 30,000 | |
Processing expense | 121,050 | |
Default expense | 80,700 | |
Net income | $ 91,050 |
Budget | Actual | |
---|---|---|
Interest income | $645,600 | $ 645,766 |
Interest expense | 322,800 | 314,360 |
Net interest income | $322,800 | $ 331,406 |
Fixed overhead | 30,000 | 30,200 |
Processing expense | 121,050 | 130,522 |
Default expense | 80,700 | 77,800 |
Net income | $ 91,050 | $ 92,884 |
Loans | 8,070,000 | $8,062,000 |
Deposits | 8,070,000 | $8,123,000 |
Budget | Actual | Fav. (Unfav.) Variance | |
---|---|---|---|
Interest income | $645,600 | $ 645,766 | $ 166 |
Interest expense | 322,800 | 314,360 | 8,440 |
Net interest income | $322,800 | $ 331,406 | $ 8,606 |
Fixed overhead | 30,000 | 30,200 | (200) |
Processing expense | 121,050 | 130,522 | (9,472) |
Default expense | 80,700 | 77,800 | 2,900 |
Net income | $ 91,050 | $ 92,884 | 1,834 |
Loans | 8,070,000 | $8,062,000 | $ (8,000) |
Deposits | 8,070,000 | $8,123,000 | $(53,000) |
Before we dig into understanding variances, we need to define a couple of terms.
Note that this definition is related to the data selection issue on the mid-term.
Total Variance = Actual Cost - Standard Cost
Total variance is equal to actual cost minus standard cost.
Symbol | Subscript | ||
---|---|---|---|
Total Variance | TV | Actual | a |
Quantity | Q | Standard | s |
Price | P |
Note: I’ll give you the relationship above, and you can either memorize or derive the other forms.
TV = [Qa(Pa−Ps)] + [Ps(Qa−Qs)]
The intuition behind this decomposition is critical.
TV = Qa(Pa−Ps) + Ps(Qa−Qs)
Total Variance | Price Variance | Volume Variance |
---|---|---|
TV | [Qa(Pa−Ps)] | [Ps(Qa−Qs)] |
This is the general form: TV = [Qa(Pa−Ps)] + [Ps(Qa−Qs)] now we’ll consider specific versions.
Actual DL Cost | Flexible Budget | Standard DL Cost | |
---|---|---|---|
General Form | Pa × Qa | Ps × Qa | Ps × Qs |
We have other terms for the price and quantity of labor!:
Total Variance | Actual DL Cost | Flexible Budget | Standard DL Cost |
---|---|---|---|
(Ha×Wa) − (Ws×Hs) | Wa × Ha | Ws × Ha | Ws × Hs |
Total Variance | Wage Variance | Efficiency Variance |
---|---|---|
(Ha×Wa) − (Ws×Hs) | Wa × Ha − Ws × Ha | Ws × Ha − Ws × Hs |
[Ha(Wa−Ws)] + [Ws(Ha−Hs)] | Ha(Wa−Ws) | Ws(Ha−Hs) |
Why is the “Volume Variance” called the “Efficiency Variance” when we are talking about labor?
Large variances in either direction indicate performance is not as planned, due to either poor planning, poor management, or random fluctuation.
Actual DM Cost | Flexible Budget | Standard DM Cost | |
---|---|---|---|
General Form | Pa × Qa | Ps × Qa | Ps × Qs |
For materials we stick with the term “Price” and “Quantity”
Total Variance | Actual DM Cost | Flexible Budget | Standard DM Cost |
---|---|---|---|
(Qa×Pa) − (Ps×Qs) | Pa × Qa | Ps × Qa | Ps × Qs |
Total Variance | Price Variance | Quantity Variance |
---|---|---|
(Qa×Pa) − (Ps×Qs) | Pa × Qa − Ps × Qa | Ps × Qa − Ps × Qs |
[Qa(Pa−Ps)] + [Ps(Qa−Qs)] | Qa(Pa−Ps) | Ps(Qa−Qs) |
For the sake of a simple example assume that the Toronto Engine Plant exists and has the following attributes:
Forecast | |
---|---|
Fixed Overhead (FOH) | $1,350,000 |
Variable Overhead (VOH) | $14 |
Budgeted Volume (BV) | |
(the driver is DLH) | 67,500 hours |
Remember that this “budgeted volume” is different than the “standard volume” though this distinction isn’t particularly clear given the way that we named things in the direct variances.
Remember that Flexible Budgets are always formulas.
OHR = (BOH/BV) = (FOH/BV) + VOH OHR = ($2,295,000/67,000hours) = $1, 350, 000/67, 000hours + $14OHR = 34$$
Budgeted Volume (Using Expected Volume)-Toronto Engine Plant’s Cylinder Boring Department
Product | Expected Production | Standard Hours per Block | Budgeted Volume |
---|---|---|---|
4-cylinder blocks | 25,000 blocks | 0.50 | 12,500 |
6-cylinder blocks | 40,000 blocks | 0.70 | 28,000 |
8-cylinder blocks | 30,000 blocks | 0.90 | 27,000 |
Total | 95,000 blocks | ||
Budgeted volume | 67,500 |
Product | Actual Production | Standard Hours per Block | Standard Volume | Actual Volume |
---|---|---|---|---|
4-cylinder blocks | 27,000 blocks | 0.50 | 13,500 | 14,200 |
6-cylinder blocks | 41,000 blocks | 0.70 | 28,700 | 29,000 |
8-cylinder blocks | 28,000 blocks | 0.90 | 25,200 | 25,000 |
Total | 96,000 blocks | |||
Standard volume (SV) | 67,400 | |||
Actual volume (AV) | 68,200 |
Budgeted | Standard | Actual |
---|---|---|
67,500 | 67,400 | 68,200 |
$2,300,000
Total Overhead Variance = Actual Overhead Costs - Overhead Absorbed AOH − (OHR×SV) = AOH − (OHR×SV)$2,300,000 - $2,291,600 = $8,400
Interpretation: - Overhead is ‘Underabsorbed’, if actual > absorbed - Overhead is ‘Overabsorbed’, if actual < absorbed
Total Overhead Variance = Actual Overhead - Overhead Absorbed
TOV | = | AOH | - | OA | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OSV | = | AOH | - | FB@AV | ||||
OEV | = | FB@AV | - | FB@SV | ||||
OVV | = | FB@SV | - | OA |
TOV | = | AOH | - | OHR × SV | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OSV | = | AOH | - | FOH+(VOH×AV) | ||||
OEV | = | FOH+(VOH×AV) | - | FOH+(VOH×SV) | ||||
OVV | = | FOH+(VOH×SV) | - | OHR × SV |